Comparison between Pipelle Sampling and Hysteroscopy Guided Biopsy in Histologic Evaluation of Endometrium in Tertiary Care Hospital in Pakistan

Introduction: Abnormal uterine bleeding is one of the commonest issues in perimenopausal age group. The proportion 9-30% reproductive This extent rises to 70% and postmenopausal women’s. Irregular dying (AUB) warrants an intensive assessment females subsequently it’s vital perform it a cost-effective way with available resources. Objective: To compare efficacy Hysteroscopic guided biopsy endometrial cytology find out detecting different normal abnormal patterns Study design & Settings: It prospective comparative study conducted at Social Security Hospital, Multan Road, Lahore included patients 30 years above chief complaints bleeding. Duration: 01 year January 2020 December Sample: 100 Inclusion Exclusion Criteria: Females having symptoms than are study. who pregnant infection or malignancy excluded from research Results: Planned hospital-based was done hundred taken after informed consent, inclusion exclusion criteria. Endometrial thickness assessed all cases <5 mm will be avoided Mean patient found 45 standard deviation 7.43. Practical implication Conclusion: get sample by pipelle technique safe procedure. has high specificity, sensitivity, positive negative predictive values when compared hysteroscopy. In this way, obtain adequate sample, Pipelle should considered as important investigation. Keywords: bleeding, Pipelle, Endometerial sampling, FIGO